Philip Henning vs Filip Jeff Planinsek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Filip Jeff Planinsek has been slightly more successful with his second serve, winning 43.29% of points, compared to Philip Henning's 41.84%. Could this small edge make a difference in their performance?
• Analyzing return game effectiveness, Planinsek has excelled by winning 49.30% of opponents' second serve points, while Henning captures 45.63%. However, Henning has a slight lead in first serve return points at 25.70%, compared to Planinsek's 24.12%.
• When under pressure, Planinsek shows resilience, saving 57.18% of breakpoints. In contrast, Henning saves 49.58%, suggesting Planinsek may better handle high-stress situations.
• Overall win rates in the past year favor Henning, who has secured victories in 76.19% of his matches, outperforming Planinsek's 65.22%. Does this indicate a broader competitiveness for Henning?
• Both players have their highest career win percentages on Hard courts, each clocking in at 61%. However, on Indoor Hard courts, Henning holds a slight advantage with a 56% win rate compared to Planinsek's 50%.
• The level of tournaments they've been active in shows that while both have fared well in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, Henning has won 86.36% of such matches, surpassing Planinsek's 68.18%.
• Planinsek generally competes against lower-ranked opponents (average rank of 430.04) compared to Henning’s opponents who average a rank of 361.08. How might this impact their match when facing higher-caliber players?
• In deciding sets, Henning's 71% success rate surpasses Planinsek's 63%, indicating a stronger finish in tight matches for Henning.
• Recent form displays that Planinsek converts break points marginally better at 35.33%, relative to Henning's 33.08%. Can this affect match outcomes significantly?

Editorial Prediction (November 21, 2025, UTC):

Examining the current form and statistics, Filip Jeff Planinsek holds slightly better numbers in second serve points won and return points won on opponents’ second serves. This could suggest a potential edge in rallies where serving vulnerabilities can be exploited.

However, Philip Henning boasts a superior overall win percentage over the past year, indicating a broader base of competitiveness and likely success when faced with diverse challenges.

Despite Planinsek's slight advantage in breakpoint conversion and his resilience under pressure, when it comes to deciding sets and facing higher-ranked opponents, Henning seems to have a more robust track record.

Considering these factors, while Planinsek has shown some critical strengths, the scales tilt slightly in favor of Philip Henning, who is more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming match.